The Post 9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act: Isn’t it time that the Bush Administration begins to “Support Our Troops”?

Once again, Sen. Jim Webb of Virginia has stepped up to the plate to improve conditions for our fighting men and women in the Armed Services. This is not the first time he’s done so, as RPO supported The Webb-Hagel Amendment this past September, which would have allowed equal time at home between deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan. It went down to defeat, yet it is now being implemented by the Armed Forces as we speak! This present Bill would, in short, return the educational benefits of the GI Bill, which was offered to “The Greatest Generation” of Veterans who fought in WWII to our Armed Forces fighting in Post 9/11, whether it is in Afghanistan or Iraq. Sounds like a good idea?......not to President Bush, as he has threatened to veto it as too costly, as well as an incentive for recruits to leave military service after one hitch!

webb

The “Post 9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act” (S.22) would increase educational benefits to the military who have seen active service since September 11, 2001. This would also include the National Guard. It would be proportional to the amount of time spent in service, up to 36 months. This equals a four year academic education. The benefits would cover up to the most expensive state university as well as coverage for housing and other costs incurred in receiving a four year degree. The Bill would allow the government to match, dollar for dollar, additional cost of attending those schools whose tuition exceeds the amount allotted. Veterans would have up to fifteen years to claim their benefits, after leaving active duty. Most importantly, all of this would be available to the National Guard. Click here to read the entire Bill. At the moment, Veterans are covered by the Montgomery GI Bill, which was designed for peacetime. For the past 6 years, however, we’ve been a State of War, although the American Public has yet to feel the pinch….up to now! That’s it in a nutshell, as I have paraphrased from the fact sheet. Sounds reasonable, doesn’t it? So why has President Bush threatened to Veto it?

The original GI Bill Of Rights was signed into law by President Roosevelt on June 22, 1944, under which millions of servicemen received educational, as well as helping them purchase homes for their families. During the Korean War, The Veterans Readjustment Assistance Act of 1952 extended those benefits to our servicemen up to 1960. Not only did these acts provide aid and compensation to our returning servicemen and women, but it helped establish the Middle Class, which most of us have taken for granted. Prior to WWII, the United States was in The Depression, with millions out of work and what Middle Class had been created in the 1920s boom, no longer existed. This newly created Middle Class is what made America the greatest country in history! We failed our veterans after the Viet Nam War! We pretended that it never happened, and when confronted with the consequences of our retuning servicemen and women, we looked the other way. We have yet to resolve the Viet Nam War issue, but that’s for another article later! So why does President Bush threaten to Veto this Bill? The Administration’s position is that the bill is too generous, as well as encouraging our veterans to leave military service and seek a college education. The Cost! Look at the continuing cost of the War in Iraq. We have troops returning on their third or fourth tour of duty! To add insult to injury, in 2002, the Army added the “Stop Loss” Policy which involuntarily extends their hitch up to one year, when their tour of duty is completed and they are ready to leave. Is this any way to run an Army? It certainly will not help in future recruitment, but the Bush Administration continues on with this dangerous strategy. If we are to continue, at least we can reward our servicemen and women who place their lives in danger every day, when and if they leave our Armed Services for civilian life!

So…..how do the candidates stand on this issue? Senator and Republican Candidate John McCain has allied himself with the Bush Administration on this one. First remaining silent, McCain and now seeking a compromise with Senator Webb is his way of diverting the embarrassment for not supporting the troops. Leading Democratic candidate Senator Barack Obama fully supports the Webb Bill and takes issue with fellow Senator McCain on his stand as does Seantor Hillary Clinton, who was among the first of the candidates to make this an issue. The Bill has bipartisan support with Republicans, such as Senator Chuck Hagel and Senator John Warner as two of its co-sponsors. The House of Representatives has already passed their Bill on May 15, 2008 by an overwhelming margin of 256 Yeas to 166 Nays. Over the past 6 years, we have failed to support our troops by failing to provide them with the best equipment for fight the war, by having them return on two, three or even four separate tours of duty and by locking them in with the “Stop Loss Policy,” which has extended their commitment by nearly a year. We have seen the Bush Administration propose cuts to The VA, as well as the scandal at Walter Reed Hospital. Now, when our exhausted servicemen and women are due to return home, this Administration wants to deny them the chance to receive an education, which we have, in the past, provided our soldiers in the time of war! This is intolerable! If you want to hear it directly from Sen. Jim Webb on Meet the Press, which aired on May 18th, take a couple of minutes and watch the video clip provided below.


Comments

I regret not responding to

I regret not responding to this current activity regarding legislation to benefit US Veterans, especially since I am one and have been a recipient of Veteran’s Benefits. One of the ironies in this delay stems from the fact that I have been assisting a close friend, a registered lobbyist, in keeping the current Massachusetts Governor from commingling veterans’ state benefits into the General Fund.
That there are tried and true veterans on both sides of this issue relieves me of the concern of individual senators’ and representatives’ motives. However, I will not blind myself to the finesse used in joining the bill to further defense appropriations which created a conundrum for Senator McCain. Interpreting into a “Stop Loss” factor is legitimate. I’ll give that. But, doing so, I’ll discount the issues regarding Walter Reed, as it has been addressed and currently being corrected. As to failing to provide out troops with the best equipment; think how many years of abuse the military has endured. That is an old saw that goes back to the days of the Continental Congress.
The current Congress has little regard for military matters at all. My interpretation is they hate the idea currently serving soldiers and veterans for their past. Liberals love to cite the hundreds of veterans who are living under bridges; it’s a figure to add to the misery index. If they have to consider them at all, they’d rather see them under bridges. When they consider the VA they think only in dollars not in people. Thus the VA that saved me was a 5 star compared to the indifference that is prevalent today. I go for the idea that a veteran should be given a general health card that could be used by used at any health facility for the appropriate needs of the veteran. (In only a few sites do veteran facilities provide the same broad care that existed 30 - 40 years ago.) Maybe a veteran would need to take a day to get to a facility and wait. (Sure, tell an employer why you weren’t there.) It isn’t that veterans haven’t taken up other health plans, we have. Yet, that agreement with the government that was made by active duty personnel and those extended, is one agreement that began failing in the mid-70’s. Medications are another matter that went on the cheap in 1993.
Frankly, I don’t fault Webb, Hegel, McCain or any other participant in this debate. I just see the issue as transparent. It’s a convenient wedge to use in a campaign year which is, for me intolerable.

I agree with your assessment

I agree with your assessment of the plight of a our Armed Forces and that it is “an old saw”, which is taken out at election time, or whenever it might be appropriate to get some attention on a particular subject. I disagree that there was any political motivation on the part of Sen. Jim Webb of VA, who has had the best interests of our Armed Forces ever since he took is place in the Senate. Webb joined with Se. Chuck Hagel of NB in sponsoring the Webb-Hagel Amendment, which would have ordered equal deployments between seeing action in Iraq and Afghanistan and being home. Both Webb and Hagel served in Vietnam and Webb was Secretary of the Navy under the Regan Administration in 1987. He also has a son who has served in Iraq and may be serving there now. I do not question either Sen. Webb’s or Sen. Hagel’s intentions, as to proposing and legislation, which assists the Military. They have been there, where most of us haven’t! With the exception of WWII, we have disregarded the plight of our fighting men and women, especially when they return. Our nation’s shameful embarrassment as to how we treated our servicemen and women after the Vietnam Conflict still continues to be a major problem. Many remain faceless victims in homeless shelters throughout this nation! It is unfortunate that only the “Liberals” bring this to our attention from time to time. Why not others? The Vietnam Conflict has yet to be resolved in this country and we only need to look back four years to the Campaign of 2004 to reinforce that statement. We do not want the same fate for the servicemen and women returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. It’s time to support our troops and stand behind whoever brings forth legislation to alleviate the suffering, which faces those who live through War!

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is used to prevent automated spam submissions.